A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
A Simple Key For family law cases Unveiled
Blog Article
refers to a landmark case decided via the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 2012. In this article’s a brief overview:
The main target is around the intention to cause injury. This can be a major dilemma: an especially very low threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Deterrence: The worry of severe repercussions, including capital punishment, is meant to deter likely criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is vital in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines various criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for all those found guilty.
This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it suitable towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified by the decision of the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Concerning the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice will not be served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service with the grievance notice is a mandatory necessity plus a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The regulation requires that a grievance notice be served around the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. If your employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
The regulation as set up in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
When the petitioner is just present in the place of occurrence without causing any injury into the deceased or PWs then in this kind of circumstances, whether He's vicariously liable shall be decided via the figured out trial Court after recording on the evidence.
In some jurisdictions, case law could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family regulation.
Looking for read more that price of a Kenwood hand mixer in Pakistan? Check out this resource: kenwood hand mixer price in pakistan.
13309-B of 2010 to generally be weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed for the time of the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, So, confirmed custody of the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any effective purpose at this stage.”
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does present for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a significant crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set through the government.